Thank you Will Fullwood, Dr. Mary M. Marshall, SoulSisterOG, Diana Feather, Lauren Brewster, and many others for tuning into my live video! Join me for my next live video in the app.
At Davos, PM Carney argued that the postwar era of stability is over and that the rush back to coercion is a mistake. Tanks, tariffs, and territorial threats may grab headlines, but they don’t build legitimacy or lasting security. Ukraine, he said, shows how shared values, alliances, and public solidarity can blunt aggression in ways raw force alone cannot.
It was an implicit rebuke of Trump-style hardball—from Greenland talk to casual sovereignty threats. Where hard power seeks to dominate, Carney’s soft power lives in trade rules, culture, and even consumer choices. His Jack-and-Coke story wasn’t trivial; it was the point. Power doesn’t only come from what governments can seize, but from what people willingly stand behind—and that kind is harder to intimidate away.
Minnesota shows what open confrontation with the federal deportation machine looks like: overwhelming ICE surges that dwarf local police, traumatizing tactics like using a five-year-old child as bait, and then subpoenas and investigations aimed at branding mayors, agencies, and state officials as “obstructive” for trying to protect residents. The point isn’t one raid or one family. It’s to turn resistance itself into a legal risk for anyone in power who refuses to comply.
Tennessee is being groomed as the opposite model: forced cooperation. State law is rewritten so sheriffs, cities, schools, and courts must assist ICE or face penalties, locking them into a permanent reporting and verification regime. That’s the real danger of a “testbed.” Once this architecture exists, the same mass raids and pressure tactics seen in Minnesota can roll out with local help instead of local pushback—and the machinery won’t stop at immigration. It’s a template that can be aimed next at protesters, organizers, or any group labeled inconvenient.
“A government that rules by terrorizing families is rehearsing for broader repression.”
Michael Fanone’s blow-up with Ivan Raiklin at the Jack Smith hearing wasn’t a sideshow—it was the point. A cop who was beaten and nearly killed defending the Capitol came face to face with a man who denies the crime, cheers the perpetrators, and has reportedly threatened his family. That collision is what January 6 still looks like: lived violence crashing into organized denial, inside the very institution that was attacked.
The fact that this happened during a hearing about Jack Smith’s prosecutions only sharpens it. January 6 isn’t over; it’s being actively rewritten. As extremists recast rioters as “patriots” and politicians flirt with pardons, the fight has moved from the mob to the halls of Congress. Fanone’s rage wasn’t a loss of decorum—it was a refusal to let the assault on democracy be memory-holed, sanitized, or turned into performance art for the people who want to finish the job without the cameras.
“You don’t save democracy by sidelining the voters most invested in it.”
Jasmine Crockett’s Senate run against James Talarico isn’t just a Texas primary—it’s a familiar stress test for how Democrats treat Black women who refuse to be quiet. Crockett dominates Black voters while polls show Talarico leading among white and Hispanic voters, and already the old language of “electability” is doing its work: soft-dismissal, coded doubts, and smears that echo the treatment of Kamala Harris. In a majority-minority state hollowed out by gerrymandering and minority rule, Crockett’s unapologetic style threatens people more comfortable with safe profiles than with confronting power.
The danger isn’t Crockett losing a primary—it’s Democrats sabotaging themselves. As she’s warned, this election cycle may be democracy’s last real firewall against autocracy, and Texas isn’t winnable without the voters she energizes. Turning a Black woman’s candidacy into a proxy war over respectability and ambition doesn’t build unity; it drains it. If Democrats want turnout, affordability, and democratic survival to matter more than internal score-settling, they’ll have to stop treating their boldest messengers as liabilities—and start acting like the stakes are real.
“Every right we have exists because citizens before us chose participation over silence.”
If you like what you read you can support this publication and other projects… or Buy Me a Coffee
Support our mission to increase civic engagement and consider becoming a paid subscriber.
Advocacy Arena Network:
Join the chat on our bi-weekly live “Fired Up Friday” here at 4:30p EST
🎙️Podcast: (Connections & Conversations with Dee Batiste)
SOCIALS:
🐳Spoutible: Good Trouble Chat & DEEscussions
YouTube: Fired Up Fridays & Democracy Roundtable Archives
Advocacy Arena is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work to increase civic engagement, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.
Sources:
